Friday 13 September, 2013

No Justice For Jeff Chen

by Doug Chin, OCA Greater Seattle President

The decision by federal Judge Thomas Zilly to overturn the unanimous verdict of an 8-person jury that the City of Medina and City Manager Donna Hanson fired Police Chief Jeff Chen because of racial discrimination and to order a new trial was atrocious.

Judge Zilly decided that Chen’s attorney, Marianne Jones, “relied primarily on innuendo and subterfuge rather than evidence” to establish racial discrimination. Ostensibly, the Judge was referring to all the racial slurs (“…you eat turkey “at Thanksgiving?; “I thought Chinese people were more patient than that,” and “I thought that you people had small penis”) that the City Manager and Medina city employees directed at Chen, and the times they racially differentiated him (“you people..), and referring to him as a “smiling Chinese.”

How can Judge Zilly say that these racial slurs are not evidence of racial discrimination?
How can Zilly, a white man, gauge the degree of insult, hurt and racial discrimination of such a remark. Tiger Woods said if was “hurtful” when fellow golfer Sergio Garcia remark –“We will have him (Woods) around every night. We will serve him fried chicken.” When basketball great Rick Barry was TV commentator and turned to African American star Bill Russell and said “You people like watermelon,” he was fired.

To me – as a Chinese American and I am sure for Jeff Chen – the racial remarks by the City Manager and other city staff were very insulting, hateful and demeaning. Moreover, such racial slurs is clear evidence that persons making these remarks are prejudice. Judge Zilly is wrong to assume otherwise. After all, are we to believe that she and others who make racial slurs do not harbor greater prejudice towards Chinese and/or other people of color?

By the way, did City Manager Donna Hanson and others who made racial slurs ever apologize for their remarks? I don’t think so. Like others, she has a socially internalized and institutionalized racially-prejudicial attitude towards Chinese and probably other persons of color. She is what I call an “institutional racist,” someone whose bigotry is so ingrained that racial slurs appears innocuous to them.

And what is all this about Judge Zilly claim that the City of Medina, even if City Manager Hanson had a racial motive for firing Chen, would have fired him for lying to investigators, forging memorandums under subordinates’ names, destroying data, improperly using city funds for purchases, snooping in other officials’ e-mails, and losing the confidence of subordinates? It seems that the Judge is saying that the City would have been justified in firing Chen on these grounds, which would be highly doubtful. First of all Chen refuted all these claims, which were fabricated or irrelevant. Furthermore, there are numerous cases where people lie, destroy data, snoop at others e-mails and/or don’t like their boss. Yet, they don’t get fired, unless that is, they are really after you.

Clearly, Judge Zilly, in overturning the jury’s decision is playing both judge and jury, and his opinion favors the City of Medina claims. How can Chen get a fair trial with him being the judge. He already has his mind made up. He is prejudicial. How can Chen get a fair trial anywhere when it is clear that a judge has clearly decided that there was, at most, a weak case of discrimination. Unbelievable. There can be no justice for Jeff Chen.

Sadly, Zilly’s decision is reminiscent of the prejudice and discrimination faced by the early Chinese in America. In the 1880s here in Washington and West, the treatment of Chinese was brutal. In town and town, the Chinese was routinely beaten, robbed, and forced out. Hundreds of Chinese were killed, many hanged. Yet there were few arrest and a jury conviction was rare. The judicial system did not work for the Chinese then. Ironically, here in the year 2013, the judge overturned the jury’s decision that found the City of Medina and Donna Hanson guilty of discrimination against a Chinese. The judge action is not only a slap in the face of Jeff Chen, it’s a slap in the face to Chinese Americans in this state. There is no justice for Chen and us Chinese.

Judge Zilly wrote that he called for a new trial “to prevent a miscarriage of justice.” The miscarriage of justice was not the verdict in the initial trial, it is Judge Zilly overturning the jury’s verdict, and his decision for a new trial.


  • Jim Souders says:

    Did you really say that there is no justification for firing a police chief simply because he has been shown to be guilty of;

    “lying to investigators, forging memorandums under subordinates’ names, destroying data, improperly using city funds for purchases, snooping in other officials’ e-mails, and losing the confidence of subordinates?

    This is the police chief for god’s sake! This is the one person you have the right to expect to act honestly and forthrightly..

    One could argue whether or not this is all true or not..but not whether warrants dismissal. (By the way, as the judge correctly points out these were not refuted).

    You have done yourself and your friends a embarrassing disservice by suggesting that this type of dishonest, illegal and unethical behavior by anyone let alone a chief of police warrants looking the other way.

  • Craig says:

    Why wasn’t Mr. Chen charged with violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and/or the Stored Communications Act. The city should not have stopped at firing him when he broke federal laws by accessing other employees’ emails with another person’s password.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *